Ubuntu Forums Beginner Team Job Posting Board

Two possible methods are currently proposed:

JPB with FG LP teams

Life cycle for jobs:
1). Job posted
2). Admin reviews job and assigns to a FG LP team if applicable
3). BT member goes to FG bugs page and selects interesting job
4). Member assigns but to himself and documents work
5). Member completes work, sets status to "Fix Released" and posts "Job Completed" in bug.

Process for Members:
1). Go to FG LP team you are involved with
2). Pick interesting job, assign to yourself, and document work
4). After work is completed, mark as "Fix Released" and post "Job Completed" in bug

Process for admins:
1). Check for new unassigned bugs for project
2). Review for scope, accuracy, and feasibility
3). Assign good bugs to FG LP teams
4). Occasionally check FG pages and follow up with leads to make sure standards are followed and work balance is appropriate

JPB without FG LP teams

Life cycle for jobs:
1). Job posted
2). Admin reviews job and changes status to "Confirmed"
3). Admin changes title to include proper FG in bracketAssign good bugs to FG LP teamss (IE [Dev FG]) and includes FG in the tags (IE "devfg")
4). Member goes to project bug page and finds interesting work
6). Member assigns bug to himself, documents work, sets status to "In Progress"
7). Member completes work, sets status to "Fix Released" and posts "Job Completed" in bug

Process for members:
1) Go to project bug page
4). Filter jobs by "Unassigned"
5). Manually parse open bugs by FG
6). Pick an interesting job, assign to yourself, and document work
7). Set status to "In Progress"
8). Complete work, set status as "Fix Released" and post "Job Completed" in bug

Process for admins:
1). Check for new unassigned bugs for project
2). Review for scope, accuracy, and feasibility
3). Change status to "Confirmed"
4). Change title to include proper FG in brackets (IE [Dev FG]) and add proper FG tag (IE devfg)
5). Occasionally check FG pages and follow up with leads to make sure standards are followed and work balance is appropriate

Using one in certain circumstances, and another otherwise wouldn't be a good standard to implement due to the different steps necessary for each group detailed above. There needs to be testing as to which one is best, or whether a hybrid should be the course forward.