Fixing Bugs With Patches

Registered by David Murphy on 2009-05-05

Review of process identified at Karmic UDS for dealing with bugs with patches. Does the process outlined still make sense?

Blueprint information

Status:
Complete
Approver:
Marjo F. Mercado
Priority:
High
Drafter:
Brian Murray
Direction:
Approved
Assignee:
Brian Murray
Definition:
Approved
Series goal:
Accepted for lucid
Implementation:
Implemented
Milestone target:
milestone icon ubuntu-10.04-beta-1
Started by
Marjo F. Mercado on 2009-12-03
Completed by
Brian Murray on 2010-03-22

Related branches

Sprints

Whiteboard

2009-11-30 - changing implementation status to Not Started to reset it from being complete

Work items:
[james-w] Get in touch with Daniel Chen about Reviewers Team: DONE
[dholbach] Create ubuntu code reviewers team in Launchpad: DONE
[dholbach] Document process at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/CodeReviews: DONE
[brian-murray] Write a script to subscribe the team to new bugs with patches: DONE
[brian-murray] Document new tag "patch-needswork" and "patch-refused" and add to the list and official bug tags: DONE
[brian-murray] Blog about process: DONE
[dholbach] Blog about progress: DONE
[brian-murray] Keep stats on quantity of bugs with patches: DONE
[brian-murray] Make a graph of bugs with patches: DONE
[brian-murray] Document process for bugs w/ branches to request a merge proposal for the reviewers team to review: POSTPONED to ubuntu-10.04-beta-1
[james-w] File a bug (bug 483931) that there is not an active reviews page for ubuntu: DONE

Work items for ubuntu-10.04-beta-1:
[brian-murray] Document process for bugs w/ branches to request a merge proposal for the reviewers team to review: DONE
[brian-murray] Investigate have the script that watches for patches watch for branches w/o merge proposals: DONE

Bugs with branches notes (bdmurray)
While it'd be possible to have another script subscribe the ubuntu-reviewers team to bugs with branches the workflow for it is significantly different from the workflow for bugs with branches that they should not be shoe-horned into this specification.

(?)

Work Items