On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 2:44 AM, Colin Ian King
<email address hidden> wrote:
> Would an immediate return with some error/warning message be more
> appropriate that a 10 second delay?
Yes. I would think that the amount of time to wait could be an option.
I've read that in some scenarios users have wanted more than 10 seconds and
in our use-case; I would run with zero-time out.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 2:44 AM, Colin Ian King
<email address hidden> wrote:
> Would an immediate return with some error/warning message be more
> appropriate that a 10 second delay?
Yes. I would think that the amount of time to wait could be an option.
I've read that in some scenarios users have wanted more than 10 seconds and
in our use-case; I would run with zero-time out.
> /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 1760173 /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ zfs-linux/ +bug/1760173/ +subscriptions
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> zfs, zpool commands hangs for 10 seconds without a /dev/zfs
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https:/