With the three combined I get down to:
real 0m20.900s us sy id wa st 32 33 35 0 0
43.88% swapper 21.48% sshd 3.07% dbus-daemon 2.78% systemd 2.10% gdbus 1.96% grep 1.80% run-parts 1.68% systemd-logind 1.38% find 1.24% systemd-journal 1.23% bash 1.12% update-motd-fsc 1.10% cat 0.95% awk 0.85% 50-motd-news 0.76% uname 0.70% 00-header 0.69% 91-release-upgr 0.67% 97-overlayroot 0.67% 50-landscape-sy 0.62% date 0.61% 90-updates-avai 0.56% 95-hwe-eol 0.54% cut
None of the remaining big contributions to consumption is from the MOTD efforts (all <2%).
That is reasonable, nice time gain as well as reduced cpu consumption.
With the three combined I get down to:
real 0m20.900s
us sy id wa st
32 33 35 0 0
43.88% swapper
21.48% sshd
3.07% dbus-daemon
2.78% systemd
2.10% gdbus
1.96% grep
1.80% run-parts
1.68% systemd-logind
1.38% find
1.24% systemd-journal
1.23% bash
1.12% update-motd-fsc
1.10% cat
0.95% awk
0.85% 50-motd-news
0.76% uname
0.70% 00-header
0.69% 91-release-upgr
0.67% 97-overlayroot
0.67% 50-landscape-sy
0.62% date
0.61% 90-updates-avai
0.56% 95-hwe-eol
0.54% cut
None of the remaining big contributions to consumption is from the MOTD efforts (all <2%).
That is reasonable, nice time gain as well as reduced cpu consumption.