Comment 11 for bug 1630073

Revision history for this message
Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) wrote :

Thanks for the info Michael on the Status.

I wanted to let you know that since one of the main goals for DPDK was to become a sync to Debian it is in proposed now this way.
That includes the expected component mismatch on python-pyelftools - and since we have to rebuild openvswitch against that new DPDK API that is in the dependency chain behind it.

So we are kind of waiting on this - let us know when you know more on this.
If you could prioritize this (as it should be a rather small package) that would be great.