Comment 17 for bug 176125

Revision history for this message
Richard Hansen (rhansen) wrote :

Updated links:
  * RFC4941 (obsoletes RFC3041), written in September 2007:
    http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4941
  * "RFC 3041 Considered Harmful" Internet Draft, written in June 2004, expired December 2004:
    http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dupont-ipv6-rfc3041harmful-05

Because the "RFC 3041 Considered Harmful" ID hasn't been refreshed since 2004, I wonder if all of the issues it raises have been addressed in the new RFC4941. I also wonder if the Linux kernel has been updated to address any differences between RFC3041 and RFC4941. (I haven't read the RFCs yet, so I'm not sure how they differ.)