Comment 19 for bug 1940141

Revision history for this message
Bruce Elrick (virtuous-sloth) wrote :

Marc, I lean your way in terms of my feel for the likelihood that someone is relying on incorrect behaviour in bionic/openssl-1.1.1.

I can say that while the lp1940141* patches rely on the pr9780 ones, the reverse is absolutely not the case and thus the lp1940141 ones could be dropped as a whole to achieve the functional portion of the backport without it being optional.

But I leave that decision to those with more experience.