On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 09:03:00PM -0000, Michael Neuffer wrote:
> Could you perhaps update your package to version 2.41?
2.42 now.
> @Steve: Would you then consider picking up the change developped by
> Mark?
I don't think this is the right way to address this issue. This really
needs to happen transparently, without having to change any config files. I
think the best way to address this would be a change to the plymouth details
theme, to make it process fsck progress information the way the ubuntu theme
does.
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 09:03:00PM -0000, Michael Neuffer wrote:
> Could you perhaps update your package to version 2.41?
2.42 now.
> @Steve: Would you then consider picking up the change developped by
> Mark?
I don't think this is the right way to address this issue. This really
needs to happen transparently, without having to change any config files. I
think the best way to address this would be a change to the plymouth details
theme, to make it process fsck progress information the way the ubuntu theme
does.