Comment 3 for bug 1165002
Revision history for this message
| Salvatore Orlando (salvatore-orlando) wrote | #3 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
Yeah the difference was that for Folsom we were limited to a single instance of the l3-agent, and hence a single external network.
In that case basically the only possible deployment was to have provider-owned external networks.
With Grizzly you can have multiple external networks, which are probably still provider-owned, but a provider might want to choose how to share them among tenants.
This might be even more delicate with Havana were one might end up having tenant-owned external networks (but honestly I'm not sure whether this is on the roadmap)