On 03/21/2012 10:20 AM, Данило Шеган wrote:
> I believe we should go a different route: make the script in lp:linaro-
> license-protection testing/filefetcher.py usable by others when an
> explicit --accept-license=yes parameter is passed in. Would that be
> sufficient for your purposes, Andy?
That doesn't really work for my script because its supposed to be a
simple standalone shell script that end-users grab to reproduce an
android build from scratch.
On 03/21/2012 10:20 AM, Данило Шеган wrote: filefetcher. py usable by others when an license= yes parameter is passed in. Would that be
> I believe we should go a different route: make the script in lp:linaro-
> license-protection testing/
> explicit --accept-
> sufficient for your purposes, Andy?
That doesn't really work for my script because its supposed to be a
simple standalone shell script that end-users grab to reproduce an
android build from scratch.