Comment 15 for bug 483931

On Fri Dec 11 01:49:37 UTC 2009 Jonathan Lange wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:08 AM, James Westby <email address hidden> wrote:
> > Even a list of links to projects which have outstanding requests where
> > a review is requested for a team I am in, so I can go to those pages
> > for the details would work.
> >
>
> I like this idea.
>
> Actually, you could have an +activereviews page for Ubuntu that was a
> bit like
>
> |> aardvark (3 you must do; 6 you could do; 2 you're waiting on; 8 others)
> |> bee (no reviews)
> |> cacogen (...)
>
> With each of the lines expanding to provide a traditional
> +activereviews page. This would allow for pagination. James, would a
> page like this be useful?

That's the sort of thing we are heading towards with our external tool.

I'm not sure I would list packages that have no reviews.

I also think we should do better than alphabetic sorting. Putting things
you have reviewed for before higher, things you have uploaded lots higher,
etc. could be useful. Also, we have package sets, if you can upload to
a package set, push the members of that set higher. Push the ones
with more "must do" higer, followed by "could do."

That would start to work well for those that could upload fewer packages
I think. There would still be quite a big mass for those that could upload
everywhere though. Maybe just a "Random Review Request" button to click.

Thanks,

James