Comment 5 for bug 1016321

Revision history for this message
Joseph Heck (heckj) wrote :

well, crap:

Hello,

This message is to inform you that your request has been resolved.
without prejudice.

Thank you,

Pearl Liang
IANA

On Mon Jul 30 14:13:48 2012, pearl.liang wrote:
Hello,

Thank you for the reply. We received the following comment from
the Port Experts team:

We don't assign a separate port for a subset of functions of a single
service. FWIW, port-based access control does not significantly enhance
security for admin-specific functions. In addition, port-based flow
control should be replaced with the flow label or ToS field-based.

Regarding the requested change for the service name for port 35357,
the expert team does not recommend approval of the name change. It
is better to keep the current name 'openstack-id'.

IANA concludes that this request and the modification request (ticket
#585246) will be administratively resolved without prejudice.

If you have questions, please let us know.

Thank you,

Pearl Liang
IANA