Just my five cents worth: I would always prefer relative links for images, even if they are not in the current directory.
For example: I want to have
... << /home/blah/blah/blah/blah/blah
SOME_SUBDIRECTORY
project_1 project_1.svg
project_2 project_2.svg
... maps_library australia.png
...
Then any linked image, e.g., maps_library/australia.png should be referred to by Inkscape relatively as:
The main reason is link "breakage" - if someone takes a copy of "SOME_SUBDIRECTORY" away on their USB stick & tries to edit project_1.svg, then all links are broken.
If the links are relative, and they grabbed the whole sub-tree "SOME_SUBDIRECTORY", then everything will work.
Just my five cents worth: I would always prefer relative links for images, even if they are not in the current directory.
For example: I want to have blah/blah/ blah/blah SUBDIRECTORY
project_ 1.svg
project_ 2.svg
maps_library
australia. png
... << /home/blah/
SOME_
project_1
project_2
...
...
Then any linked image, e.g., maps_library/ australia. png should be referred to by Inkscape relatively as:
../maps_ library/ australia. png blah/blah/ blah/blah/ SOME_SUBDIRECTO RY/maps_ library/ australia. png
NOT:
/home/blah/
The main reason is link "breakage" - if someone takes a copy of "SOME_SUBDIRECTORY" away on their USB stick & tries to edit project_1.svg, then all links are broken.
If the links are relative, and they grabbed the whole sub-tree "SOME_SUBDIRECT ORY", then everything will work.