add a not-equals comparator to numeric fact conditions
Registered by
Alex Mitchell
Add a != comparator to numeric fact conditions. Currently there is >, <, >=, <=, and =.
Blueprint information
- Status:
- Not started
- Approver:
- None
- Priority:
- Medium
- Drafter:
- None
- Direction:
- Needs approval
- Assignee:
- Alex Mitchell
- Definition:
- Discussion
- Series goal:
- Accepted for 2.4
- Implementation:
-
Deferred
- Milestone target:
- None
- Started by
- Completed by
Related branches
Related bugs
Sprints
Whiteboard
Need to consider whether this is necessary, or whether a general "not" operator and composing of operators should be allowed. May defer this until version 2.3 or later.
(?)
