Comment 4 for bug 1049082
Revision history for this message
| Chris Wilson (notgary-deactivatedaccount) wrote Re: The hundred papercuts project has lost contributors and direction | #4 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
73416ba
(Get the code!)
Jack and Timothy, thanks a lot for your feedback. It is both valuable and insightful. It seems to me that the problems you describe stem from my particular interpretation of the definition of a papercut, since I've been the one most actively invalidating bugs in the papercuts backlog.
In the blueprint this bug links to, a few suggestions were raised regarding the definition of a papercuts, and whether or not it should remain as is. One suggestion was to expand the definition to cover popular apps from the archives, and another is to expand the project to cover all minor bugs on the CD, effectively replacing the 'Affects hunders papercuts' action with the 'bitssize' tag.
What do the two of you think of this, and do you have any other suggestions of your own?