Abstract AWS namespaces out of Heat
Heat adoption by cloud providers be slowed by the fact that users will be required to advertise for the competition just to write a template. While the format of Heat templates is about as basic as it comes, users should be able to express any capability of Heat with OpenStack/Heat resources entirely. It should also be possible for someone deploying heat to disable the usage of the AWS namespace entirely.
Blueprint information
- Status:
- Complete
- Approver:
- None
- Priority:
- High
- Drafter:
- None
- Direction:
- Approved
- Assignee:
- Steven Dake
- Definition:
- Approved
- Series goal:
- None
- Implementation:
- Implemented
- Milestone target:
- None
- Started by
- Steven Hardy
- Completed by
- Angus Salkeld
Whiteboard
sbaker: I'll be raising a separate blueprint for each resource that can have a native equivalent.
https:/
(zaneb) IMO this should take the form of an option in the configuration file. If AWS resources are disabled, just filter out all the resource types starting with "AWS::" when loading the plugins.
(jasond) Here's a related heat-cfntools change. The Metadata "init key" should be changed from "AWS::CloudForm
(randallburt) @jasond I think we would want to keep that though. We still want CFN compatibility and AWS::CloudForma
Work Items
Dependency tree
* Blueprints in grey have been implemented.