Prioritize apps for resource allocation
Nowadays we have all kinds of new shiny schedulers popping up now and then. They are told to increase performance under certain workloads. People seem to forget that schedulers work well only when they know which processes should be real-time and which are no way urgent, but usually nobody supplies that info to them. Remember music player hiccups during system updates? That’s exactly the issue - music player must play music in real time because it’s useless without that, and update-manager should never interrupt your workflow.
Solution? Simple: tell the scheduler who is who.
Blueprint information
- Status:
- Started
- Approver:
- None
- Priority:
- Undefined
- Drafter:
- Sergey "Shnatsel" Davidoff
- Direction:
- Approved
- Assignee:
- Sergey "Shnatsel" Davidoff
- Definition:
- New
- Series goal:
- None
- Implementation:
- Blocked
- Milestone target:
- None
- Started by
- Sergey "Shnatsel" Davidoff
- Completed by
Related branches
Related bugs
Sprints
Whiteboard
LoL, how can we implement that?? --gotwig
LoL, read the full specs before commenting!! --shnatsel
You should take a look at Verynice (http://
Wow, thanks a lot for the info! Added to the performance spec and linked there from this one. Looks like I really suck at googling recently... ~shnatsel
Thanks shnatsel, I forgot to mention the sources. This https:/
I'm working on this, looks like ulatencyd is what we need. I've expanded its configs and proposed them upstream: https:/
We're past the feature freeze and there isn't enough time to test the implications of such a big change to resource management. We should delay this to Luna +1 and concentrate on getting Luna out the door. ~DanRabbit.
I can't see why it's a big change personally. I've got the configs tested and ready for landing. I'll do one more round of testing on my Pentium III laptop just to be sure ulantencyd doesn't gobble up resources; if there will be ussues with it in beta, we can always revert it. --shnatsel
Custom configs have landed to testing PPA as "ulatencyd-
-shnatsel
One way would be to watch if the sound device is accessed. That could be done with "inotify". -- ikem
ulatencyd and custom configs are included in seeds and is be shipped in today's unstable ISO build.
I don't get what the sound device has to do with this blueprint... ~shnatsel
The video/music player needs high priority to work flawlessly. The easiest way to check if they are run is to see if something is accessing the sound card. -- ikem
They're routed through pulseaudio anyway, it's the only thing accessing the sound card. And there may be other things playing sounds, like IM clients with their notifications. I'm sure ulatencyd is sufficient. ~shnatsel
We're now blocked by bug 1034099 ~shnatsel
Work Items
Dependency tree
* Blueprints in grey have been implemented.