Comment 5 for bug 715174

Thanks for running this. It may be hard to tell on a slower machine as 10% of 500tps isnt as much as 10% of 2000tps on a faster machine, it does look like the first run is always faster then the latter runs at higher concurrency levels nothing like the original numbers though. This may tell us though that cleaning out the inno replication table didnt have much impact though. Is there any way to run this on the sysbench machines without goofing up every other sysbench run? Maybe there was some anomaly when it ran before, the code has changed a bit as well sense the original test. Thanks again for running this!