[indicators] improve the indicator selection

Bug #1134491 reported by Pat McGowan
24
This bug affects 3 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Ubuntu UX
Fix Released
High
Vesa Rautiainen
unity8 (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Medium
Nick Dedekind

Bug Description

Still not refined enough
Blank bar has caused some confusion.

<http://www.infoworld.com/d/mobile-technology/hands-the-ubuntu-touch-linux-smartphone-213277?page=0,0>: "The icons are small and closely spaced, so it's easy to open a different tray than expected."

See also duplicate blueprint <https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/client-1303-unity-ui-improve-indicator-selection>.

----------------------------------------------
Desired solution:

prototype screencast :
https://drive.google.com/a/canonical.com/#folders/0B8eY_FZZ1z7IOE5uZFRJV1RVTlU

Tags: usability
Bill Filler (bfiller)
Changed in manhattan:
assignee: nobody → Michał Sawicz (saviq)
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Oren Horev (oreneeshy) wrote : Re: [Bug 1134491] Re: [indicators] improve the indicator selection

We need a better algorithm to minimize false switching but this is not a
simple one. The issue here is interpretation of gestures that follow
a diagonal vector and how to distinguish a scroll - select an indicator
menu from a swipe - switch to another menu. It is clearly evident when
using thumbs in a one hand posture, but also when using the index finger in
a two hand posture. When a user performs a diagonal vector slight changes
of the finger movement result in change of mode from switch to select. The
main "protection" we deploy at the moment is
the commit threshold which disables menu switching pass a certain distance,
from the top edge. Obviously this is suboptimal.

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Bill Filler <email address hidden>wrote:

> ** Changed in: manhattan
> Assignee: (unassigned) => Michał Sawicz (saviq)
>
> ** Changed in: manhattan
> Status: New => Confirmed
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to
> manhattan.
> Matching subscriptions: Manhattan bugs
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1134491
>
> Title:
> [indicators] improve the indicator selection
>
> Status in The Manhattan project:
> Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> Still not refined enough
> Blank bar has caused some confusion.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/manhattan/+bug/1134491/+subscriptions
>

--
Oren Horev
Lead User Experience Designer

Canonical Design Team
+44 (0) 77 3430 8009
<email address hidden>
http://www.ubuntu.com/

Revision history for this message
kevin gunn (kgunn72) wrote :

i noticed too that the once the commit threshold is reached, when the finger travels back/upward (technically back into non-committed/threshold), movement to the next icon isn't allowed either. should it be ?? it seemed odd to me.

Changed in manhattan:
assignee: Michał Sawicz (saviq) → Oren Horev (oreneeshy)
Revision history for this message
Oren Horev (oreneeshy) wrote :

Yes. This is the intended behaviour. The idea was to establish a clear
selection region. It is interesting though to consider a trigger of
selection mode on upward pull
On 12 Mar 2013 21:00, "kevin gunn" <email address hidden> wrote:

> i noticed too that the once the commit threshold is reached, when the
> finger travels back/upward (technically back into non-
> committed/threshold), movement to the next icon isn't allowed either.
> should it be ?? it seemed odd to me.
>
> ** Changed in: manhattan
> Assignee: Michał Sawicz (saviq) => Oren Horev (oreneeshy)
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a bug assignee.
> Matching subscriptions: Manhattan bugs
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1134491
>
> Title:
> [indicators] improve the indicator selection
>
> Status in The Manhattan project:
> Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> Still not refined enough
> Blank bar has caused some confusion.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/manhattan/+bug/1134491/+subscriptions
>

Revision history for this message
kevin gunn (kgunn72) wrote :

assigning to mpt, as he's got the pleasure of owning indicators

Changed in manhattan:
assignee: Oren Horev (oreneeshy) → Matthew Paul Thomas (mpt)
Revision history for this message
Oren Horev (oreneeshy) wrote :

MPT owns the content of indicator menus. Shell UI is owned by the leads (Mika, John, Oren)

Changed in manhattan:
assignee: Matthew Paul Thomas (mpt) → Oren Horev (oreneeshy)
information type: Proprietary → Public
affects: manhattan → ubuntu-ux
Changed in ubuntu-ux:
milestone: ubuntu-13.04-month-5 → none
description: updated
Oren Horev (oreneeshy)
Changed in ubuntu-ux:
status: Confirmed → In Progress
Vesa Rautiainen (vesar)
Changed in ubuntu-ux:
assignee: Oren Horev (oreneeshy) → Vesa Rautiainen (vesar)
Shruti (kapur-shruti)
Changed in ubuntu-ux:
assignee: Vesa Rautiainen (vesar) → Shruti (kapur-shruti)
John Lea (johnlea)
Changed in ubuntu-ux:
assignee: Shruti (kapur-shruti) → Vesa Rautiainen (vesar)
Revision history for this message
Vesa Rautiainen (vesar) wrote :

We have a new improved indicators design that should solve this issue. Have a look at the prototype: https://drive.google.com/a/canonical.com/#folders/0B8eY_FZZ1z7IOE5uZFRJV1RVTlU

I will create a specification document about all needed interactions and the work will be handed over to engineering after that.

Changed in ubuntu-ux:
status: In Progress → Fix Committed
description: updated
kevin gunn (kgunn72)
no longer affects: unity8
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in unity8 (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
kevin gunn (kgunn72)
Changed in unity8 (Ubuntu):
assignee: nobody → Nick Dedekind (nick-dedekind)
importance: Undecided → Medium
Michał Sawicz (saviq)
Changed in unity8 (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
Vesa Rautiainen (vesar)
Changed in ubuntu-ux:
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.